So if the topic is difficult, what should you do? Give up and change topics? Try your best to continue ranting about that topic? Type rhetorical questions which the answers are all no? No, No, Yes. If you noticed, the last question wasn't rhetorical (if you do find a certain logic flaw, go solve the fucking sudoku or something you motherfucking show-off).
Ok fine perhaps it is best to change topics. You will probably be subconsciously doing that, if you are ranting. I mean just talk about something random like sudoku in your previous paragraph and tadaaa! Topic changed. The trick is to never let them realise you are trying to change topics, unless you are a pro like me who have been an expert at this for ages (ages is a exaggerated time dilation for a period of 1 year).
Then suddenly you have the revelation that the new topic is an even harder topic to talk about. For example, I realise I am not Japanese and dont have the expertise and qualification to talk about shit like sudoku. So what do you do now? Do you continue to type rhetorical questions which the answers are all no? Regarding this question, honestly I think I have created a paradox here. Ok, "YES" if it is rhetorical, "NO" if it is not. Just pick a side, there is no dark side, this ain't Star Wars. Although I think picking "YES" would be seen as a form of submission of the weak and thus fall closely with the dark side, but fuck you guys aren't Star Wars fans anyway, you don't have to give shit about the balance of the Force.
Ok fine perhaps it is best to continue ranting about that topic. So we move back to our dear asparagus. We try to dig deep to our creativity. We try to expand "asparagus" as an interesting topic.
Asparagus is green. Green is a colour.
Ok fuck this I give up.
Lol out.
No comments:
Post a Comment