For those who have studied english in our school, perhaps you have begun to doubt the credibility of my sentence. The sentence sounds outrightly bias and you suspect the author has had no experience or pretext in the wonderful game of golf at all. I understand that using words that are extremities like "most" do portray the effect that I am not really giving a slight bit of chance to the possibility that golf might be a fun sport. But hey, you are right, it is perfectly true that i aint giving a shit about whether I am bias or not, golf is DEFINITELY NOT FUN.
Speaking about english, perhaps it is time to practice on my english writing skills as preparation for the summative essay next week.
Looking back, God, i feel that the introduction is perhaps a little inadequate. It is only one sentence long! It does have some form of worded impact, but lack the essential background context. Here, let me rewrite to hone my weak writing skills.
Golf, perhaps, is one of the saddest most useless game ever invented.
Now that sounds much better. I have improved my phrasing. Pardon my grammatical error in the use of the words "saddest most". I pray that i dont repeat my mistakes during summative.
If you are capable of reading english, you would have realised by now the introduction remained unchanged, except that I have italicised the second introduction. If you are incapable of reading english, it doesnt really matter anyway, because you obviously can't read this sentence regardless of whether i am dedicating this sentence talking to people that aren't even reading it (a perfectly fine logical error). Perhaps the only situation which you can't read english yet visit my blog is that you are one of my japanese cousins. If you really are, do post something on my tagboard in japanese to tell me that you still do have a working internet connection after the horrendous earthquakes and tsunamis. The only thing i can offer to the people of your country is to pray. Due to unforeseen economical circumstances I am unable to donate money to that cause. I hope to resolve this economical crisis soon when i get my pocket money on 1st April. But of course, this might all be an April's Fool Joke.
Oh so much for deviating from the main subject. I believe i was explaining the important difference in my corrected introduction. The stark difference in the second introduction was the appropriate and excellent use of italicised fonts. It does provide the feel, the texture, and the indescribable sensation of an incredible literate speaker emphasizing the key points of his argument. If you are one with a background or passion in literature, it is most definite you can feel the words caress your inner ear and embrace your deep thoughts. The italicised fonts accompanied by the strong logic of the sentence, creates a work of magic.
It is of human nature, or at least of my nature, to be curious and wonder why are slanted sleeker fonts called italicised fonts. Without using the omnipotent powers of Google or Wikipedia to find the answer, perhaps it would be more fun to exercise my brain, and run through the complicated yet non-existent thought processes to accurately and quickly figure the answer out.
First of all, the word "italicised" strikes a chord. I have heard it somewhere before. Now this is where the conversation with myself gets really awkward because half of my mind recognizes the question as a rhetorical question and the other half just wants to go to sleep. So lets skip the chase, the answer is obviously Italy (do take an IQ test if you were unsure of the answer, unless you are American). Now, as normal inquisitive people, we brainstorm for anything linking the beautiful country of Italy (which is still in debt) to anything that is sleek and slanted like the italicised font:
Sleek Italian sports car, but they are not slanted.
Sleek Italian spaghetti, yet they are not slanted.
Sleek Italian pizza, yet I am just hungry.
Slanted Italian worldcup soccer team, yet i have no idea what am i talking about.
Sleek and slanted Italian underwear... Hey a match!
Sleek Italian sports car, but they are not slanted.
Sleek Italian spaghetti, yet they are not slanted.
Sleek Italian pizza, yet I am just hungry.
Slanted Italian worldcup soccer team, yet i have no idea what am i talking about.
Sleek and slanted Italian underwear... Hey a match!
Branded underwear are usually sleek, and slanted to produce such a magnificent style that makes your privates look bigger emphasizes on your inner importance. I m talking about the famous brand Dolce & Gabanna. Wearing them makes a BOLD fashion statement.
A BOLD fashion statement? The words are in BOLD! Might it be of any relevance to font change?
It came to me like a sudden enlightenment: Bold Italicised Underwear! The common three font changing aspects come from Dolce & Gabanna! What a wonderful marketing strategy to incorporate typing with the image of a branded underwear!
edit: To my utmost surprise, the italicised font format did not originate from the marketing plan of Dolce & Gabanna. I apologize on my slight error and sincerely regret if you have purchased their underwear in the midst of confusion. If you are interested with the history of italicised texts, here is the omnipotent link of wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italic_type
So here i am, still stuck on introduction. I dont think i have time anymore, perhaps i will just end my essay with a simple yet effective conclusion:
Golf, perhaps, is one of the saddest most useless game ever invented.
Using two types of font formattings, bolding and underlining, does create an everlasting impact, doesnt it? This is a rhetorical question again, but this time, the other half of my mind tells me i really need to fucking sleep.
Lol out.
No comments:
Post a Comment